Inventory Methods for Waterfowl and Allied Species:
Loons, Grebes, Swans, Geese, Ducks, American Coot and Sandhill Crane

Table of contents

Data Analysis

For each Study Area or wetland:

  1. If total counts are used:
  1. If sample counts are used:

3.4.3 Helicopter Surveys

Relative Abundance in remote or inaccessible areas for any species, but especially for breeding pair counts, brood counts, and incubating adults for the most conspicuous species (e.g., geese and swans), or breeding pair and brood counts for loons and dabbling ducks.

Helicopters are recommended to survey breeding pairs and broods in locations inaccessible by road (e.g., Boreal Forest, northwest BC). Generally, the lower flight speed of and better visibility from helicopters than fixed-wing aircraft improve the ability of observers to detect birds (Ross 1985).

Counts by helicopters or from the ground over smaller portions of the study area can be used to derive correction factors for aerial transect surveys.

Estimates are very sensitive to viewing angle, altitude, glare and flight speed therefore it is important to conduct surveys consistently (Caughley 1974; Briggs et al. 1985).

Example: Nixon and Majiski (1991) conducted breeding pair surveys in boreal forest wetlands with low waterfowl densities in the Liard Plain and Teslin River Basin. Wetlands were stratified on 1:50,000 topographical maps into three size classes (<1.5 hectares, 1.5-15 hectares and 15-300 hectares). Larger lakes were excluded because it was not feasible to obtain an accurate count. A sample of wetlands within each size class was chosen randomly but most distant wetlands were omitted due to limited time available for the survey. Observers sampled each wetland by circling it in a helicopter. The helicopter would hover while they recorded the number of birds and wetland characteristics. Counts at each wetland were repeated four times at six day intervals starting in mid- to late- May to ensure an accurate estimate of the number of breeding pairs (McKelvey 1989). The mean number of breeding pairs for each species was calculated using the four repeated surveys for each wetland. The relative abundance of breeding pairs was calculated from stratified samples. The results were used to estimate the density of breeding pairs within the entire Liard Plain and Teslin River Basin region. Stratifying by wetland size did not increase the precision of the population estimates because the sample sizes were too small (9 to 30 in each strata). It may have been better to survey more wetlands in each strata and do fewer replicate counts at each wetland.

Office Procedures

Sampling Design

Sampling Effort

Care must be taken during the counts to avoid biases as much as possible (e.g. consistent over or under counting). When biases are inherent in the counting method, no amount of additional sampling will remove them.

The use of alternating observers may help to average some observer biases. Ideally, if several observers are participating in each survey, they should rotate areas between surveys; otherwise, all sites should be surveyed by one observer during a given survey. The order in which basins are surveyed should be rotated between surveys.

Time of Survey

Personnel

Equipment


Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page