Recommended method(s): Active nest count for swallows for relative abundance. Unlimited radius point count survey for relative abundance for all species.
This technique is also used for presence/not detected surveys. Only differences from the presence/not detected survey are listed here. For details on how to conduct this type of survey see section 3.3.1
Relative abundance can be obtained in three ways:
A frequency of occurrence is the percentage of point counts at which a species is detected (Manuwal and Carey 1991).
Counting nests is an excellent index of population size for any bird species, although it requires a great deal of effort. Ryder (1986) suggests that it is seldom possible to find enough active nests for measuring a breeding population. For most of the species in this inventory group, where information on preferred nest sites and habitats is available, generating sufficient numbers for an analysis of the breeding population (colony) is possible. It is important to realize that this is only an index to density (i.e., the number of nests per unit area). The number of nests does not necessarily reflect the size of the breeding population because there are many non-breeders (Medvin et al. 1989). It may however, be possible to assess whether a nest represents a breeding pair (is active), by watching the birds (e.g. watching for food being taken into the nest, etc.).
Active nest counts differ between individual species due to differences in nest site selection. Consequently, different searching techniques are required. These groups are: 1) Barn Swallow and Cliff Swallow 2) Bank Swallow and Northern Rough-winged Swallow 3) Tree Swallow, Violet-Green Swallow and Purple Martin 4) White-Throated Swift, Violet-Green Swallow (note this species occurs in two inventory groups) 5) Vaux's Swift 6) Black Swift.
In Table 2, the habitat and nesting preferences for swallows and swifts are given. This data can be used to aid the researcher in designing a nest survey. Nest counts are not recommended for swifts as their nests are often hidden and difficult to find. Black Swifts, although relatively common during migration, have a propensity for nesting in precipitous moist canyons thus making it very difficult to find nests (Bent 1940; Campbell et al. 1990). Consequently, there are only two nest records for all of British Columbia (Campbell et al. 1990). White-throated Swifts are often found in association with Violet-Green Swallows, and nest in the dry steep canyons of the southern interior ecoprovince (Bent 1940; Cannings et al. 1987; Campbell et al. 1990). Vaux's Swift prefers to nest in broken off, hollowed stumps, within old growth coniferous forests or big cottonwood stands (Bent 1940; Campbell et al. 1990; Manuwal 1991). The difficulty in determining nesting for this species is that the nests are placed in hollow stumps, making verification extremely problematic. Unless the potential site can be somehow accessed without destroying the nest site, surveys will not be able to accurately assess the number of nests inside a hollow stump.
Table 3. Habitat and nesting characteristics of swallows and swifts nesting in British Columbia.
Species |
Habitat |
Nest Location |
Breeding System |
Tree Swallow |
Open habitat, near forest edge, often near water with standing dead trees. |
In tree cavity created by woodpeckers; readily accepts nest boxes. |
Highly social aggregate breeder, but not considered colonial because it defends area 10 to 15 m around nest site. |
Violet-green Swallow |
Open coniferous, deciduous forests, often near edge; cliff ledges. Often at high elevations. |
In tree cavities, cliff ledges, nest boxes, cracks in buildings such as shingles. |
Solitary or colonial depending on availability of habitat. 20 pairs have been recorded in one nest tree. |
Purple Martin |
Standing snags, especially near water. |
In tree cavity or nest box. In B.C., all known pairs occur in managed nest boxes on Vancouver Island. |
Eastern populations are highly colonial; in western part of range they are considered less colonial. |
Bank Swallow |
Open country with available cutbanks for nesting; near running water. |
Nests are burrows dug into cutbanks along rivers or roadsides. |
Highly colonial; up to 1000 pairs have been recorded. |
Northern Rough-winged Swallow |
Open country with available cutbanks for nesting; near running water. |
Nests in burrows created by other species such as the Bank Swallow or the Kingfisher. Often nests in association with Bank Swallows. |
Usually considered a solitary nester, however, recent reports of large colonies up to 300 pairs nesting in human-modified cut banks. |
Cliff Swallow |
Open country, near running water and highly associated with human settlements. |
Nests under eaves of barns and houses, and under bridges and culverts. |
Highly colonial; up to 1000 pairs. |
Barn Swallow |
Open country, numerous in agricultural areas; highly associated with human settlements. |
Nests under eaves and on ledges, walls of barns and houses, and under bridges and culverts. |
Solitary or in loose colonies. |
Black Swift |
In moist steep canyons. |
On cliff ledges and in crevices. |
Nest in small colonies. Colonies have not been recorded in B.C. |
Vaux's Swift |
In old growth forests? Often preferring cutover areas or burns which have left snags. |
Inside a hollow tree; often up to 20 pairs. Very few natural sites have been recorded in B.C.; most are reports of nesting in chimneys. |
Nest in small colonies. |
White-throated Swift |
In dry steep rocky canyons of the southern interior. |
On cliff ledges and in crevices of precipitous cliffs. |
Highly colonial. |
Barn and Cliff Swallows build mud nests which are highly friable, thus they must place them in locations protected from rain or run off water. Both species select protected nest sites under eaves and bridges and inside old buildings and culverts (Bent 1942; Gauthier and Thomas 1992). They nest almost exclusively on artificial structures in human environments (Erskine 1979).
Bank and Northern Rough-winged Swallows naturally nest in burrows within cutbanks of rivers and streams. They too have benefited from human activities (Erskine 1979; Weeks 1987; Moller 1989) such as extensive rock quarrying and road building which has created gravel pits and cut banks allowing for easy burrowing (nest building).
Purple Martin, Tree Swallow and Violet-green Swallow all are cavity nesters and use natural snags and artificial nest boxes throughout their range. Violet-green Swallows also nest in the cracks and crevices of buildings. Traditionally, they are hole nesters which have depended on other species such as woodpeckers to provide cavities for nest sites. They have also benefited from direct intervention by humans through placement of artificial nest boxes in open habitat (Erskine 1979; Lumsden 1986). The Purple Martin especially, has benefited from artificial nest sites, but most successfully within the eastern part of its range. Southern British Columbia is the northern extent of its western range, with only about 50 breeding birds all confined to artificial nest boxes (Siddle et al., in prep.).